Skip to main content

AI Automation & AI Agents

AI Automation for Construction & Contracting Companies

Construction generates paperwork at a scale few industries match: tender packages hundreds of pages long, daily site reports, RFIs, variation requests and subcontractor correspondence. Most of it is read and rewritten by hand, by people who should be managing the project. AI automation does the reading, summarising and chasing, so project managers spend their time on decisions.

What this covers

AI Sales & Lead AgentFollow-up & CRM AutomationCustomer Support AgentDocument & Back-office AutomationInternal Knowledge Assistant
Discuss your project ↗

What we build

Built around how you get judged.

Scoped to the conversations and workflows that cost your team the most time, and connected to the systems you already run.

01

Tender packages summarised in hours

Specifications, conditions and bills of quantities read and summarised into scope, key risks, deadlines and requirements, with page references, so the bid team decides quickly whether to pursue.

02

Site reports compiled from the field

Supervisors send voice notes, photos and short messages from site. The automation turns them into a structured daily report and logs issues against the project.

03

Subcontractor and supplier follow-up

Document requests, confirmations and deadlines chased automatically, with overdue items escalated to the project manager.

04

Client updates without extra meetings

Regular progress summaries written for clients and owners from the site reports already being filed.

05

Prequalification documents kept current

Company profile, certificates and project references assembled into the format each prequalification asks for.

The cost of skipping it

What staying as you are actually costs.

These are not hypothetical. They are the patterns we see repeatedly when a capable team is still doing by hand what software could take off it.

Tenders are skipped for lack of reading time

Viable bids are passed over because nobody had a free day to read the package properly.

Site information never reaches the office

When reporting depends on someone typing it up later, issues surface only once they have become delays.

Coordinators spend the week chasing

Following up subcontractors by phone and email is a full-time job that automation does more consistently.

Clients feel uninformed

Owners who do not hear from you assume the worst, and that uncertainty shows up at the next payment certificate.

How the project runs

From first look to handover.

How we work, phase by phase ↗
01

Discovery

We follow one tender and one live project to see where reading, reporting and chasing take time.

02

Strategy

We choose between tender analysis, site reporting and follow-up as the starting workflow, based on where the hours actually go.

03

Execution

Automations built on your report formats, tender history and project structure, tested on past packages and real site messages.

04

Delivery

Site, bid and project teams onboarded, with a review after the first month on time saved and what to extend.

FAQ

Questions we hear from construction.

If yours isn't here, send us your question. We'll answer honestly.

Ask us directly ↗

Yes. They send voice notes and photos on WhatsApp as they already do, and the structure is added on the other end.

It reads specifications, conditions and BOQs well. Drawings are summarised at a basic level, and technical interpretation stays with your engineers.

Where your software has an API, reports and issues are filed directly into it. Otherwise outputs arrive as structured documents or spreadsheets.

They are a fast first read that points to the clauses that matter, with page references. A person still reviews the package before a bid decision.

No. A smaller contractor with one estimator often feels the tender-reading load the most.

Ready to start?

Let us find the first workflow worth automating.